Who is the Man Who Made The Statement?

Who is the Man Who Made The Statement?

Who is the man who made the statement? That is what people have been asking of a statement that appeared in two reports since 2016.

In February, 2016 Grassroots Leadership published a nineteen page report titled Incorrect Care: A Prison Profiteer Turns Care into Confinement. Page 14 of that report stated, in part,

Similarly to private prison and immigrant detention contracts, the state is incentivized to keep the number of individuals confined in Littlefield high, rather than encouraging rehabilitation and release. This perverse incentive is especially troublesome because oversight for the program will come only from the agency itself. As evidence of this perverse incentive, a man housed in the Florida Civil Commitment Center revealed that CCS files excessive disciplinary reports, which are then used against program participants. He writes,

There is something fundamentally wrong when my for-profit keepers can write as many disciplinary reports against me as they please... and then use those disciplinary reports against me at trial to civilly commit me and during my annual reviews to keep me committed so my for-profit keepers can make money off me.

A footnote, #94 in the Grassroots report, simply attributes the statement of the man confined to the FCCC to "Personal Communication, December 2015."

Subsequently, the above quoted statement of that FCCC resident appeared in a July, 2022 report authored by Derek Louge of OnceFallen.com. Louge took that entire Grassroots paragraph and quoted it on page 30 of his 48 page report titled A History of the Texas Civil Commitment Program.

The entire sentence made by the man confined to the FCCC stated, "There is something fundamentally wrong when my for-profit keepers can write as many disciplinary reports against me as they please, sans any oversight from [the Florida Department of Children and Families] who has custody of me, and then use those disciplinary reports against me at trial to civilly commit me and during my annual reviews to keep me committed so my for­ profit keepers can make money off me."

So, who was the man who originally wrote the statement that appeared in the Grassroots Leadership report and subsequently was quoted in the Derek Logue report?

The man is Gary L. Perrot, author of the upcoming book Stratagems of the Devil: How Florida Prosecutors Created and Used Some of the Most Dangerous MeToo False Accusers in the World. Perrot made the statement in a December 18, 2015, fifteen page letter to Cate Graziani, Mental Health Campaigns Coordinator for Grassroots Leadership.

And now you know.

Copyright © 2022 by Gary L. Perrot

All Rights Reserved.

Copying or reproduction by any means is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of Gary L. Perrot.

Bartlett and the State Attorney's P.O. Box

Bartlett and the State Attorney's P.O. Box

If you review the list of campaign contributors to Bruce Bartlett's campaign for his bid as State Attorney, you will find a number of individuals who use the official mailing address of the State Attorney as their own address. These individuals include a teacher, retired individuals, and other people. (See List of Contributors; This list is also available as a table in the previous post, “Supporters of Corruption”).

What gives Bruce Bartlett and some of his supporters the right to use a publically paid for address as their own address is unknown.

The people of Pinellas County paid for this P.O. Box. It is the official mailing address for the State Attorney and should be used for only official business, not used for Bartlett's political campaign and aspirations, his own personal business, and Bartlett should not allow other people to use it to perpetrate a fraud by using it as their own address or making it appear that it is their address when it is not.

Copyright © 2022 by Gary L. Perrot

All Rights Reserved.

Copying or reproduction by any means is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of Gary L. Perrot.

New Documents Received

New Documents Received

When I make a request for or subpoena documents I phrase the request in such a way that it produces any and all documents related to the life of the witness and their friends and relatives, incident or event. This could be for criminal records; police reports; investigative reports, narratives, mental impressions and final outcomes; driver's license applications and histories; property records; vehicle records; voter registrations; employment, social media sites and posts and etc. These types of requests produce all sorts of documents including documents that are not even related to me but are related to things the State's witnesses have done throughout their lives and the lives of their friends and relatives by themselves and with other people. This then leads to speaking with witnesses and requests for yet more documents.

While it is fairly easy for me to do an investigation (by myself and with an investigator) because I know what the witnesses are lying about, it takes time to do so as one document or witness will lead to another that has to be investigated and followed up on. This process repeats again and again as the investigation gets wider and wider, producing more witnesses who may have seen, heard or know something and more documents that contain more nuggets of information, some relevant to the case and some not. All are embarrassing to the witnesses and will be included in the book, Stratagems of the Devil.

My investigation was slowed during the last two plus years because of the pandemic, as some businesses, departments and agencies were closed or short-staffed. This caused a large backlog of requests for information and documents made by me and other people to these entities. I am now just getting responses to some of my requests that were made over three years ago.

A group of new documents that I recently received is going to be devastating to some of the State’s witnesses and the State’s case. I cannot go into details about these documents because I do not want to spill the beans to the State or its witnesses as to what the documents are, what they disclose or how they impact the witnesses even though I need to furnish some of them to the State Attorney.

The investigation continues, deepens, and gets more interesting as it produces yet more embarrassing information on some of these witnesses.

The State Attorney and his witnesses will eventually come to realize that I have opened a can of worms that they are going to wish was better off left closed. 

Copyright © 2022 by Gary L. Perrot

All Rights Reserved.

Copying or reproduction by any means is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of Gary L. Perrot.